Are you looking for?
Bell v. Wolfish :: 441 U.S. 520 (1979) :: Justia U.S. Supreme Court ...
U.S. Supreme Court. Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520 (1979). Bell v. Wolfish. No. 77- 1829. Argued January 16, 1979. Decided May 14, 1979. 441 U.S. 520. Syllabus.
Bell v. Wolfish - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520 (1979), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court found that it was not a violation of the Fourth Amendment to perform ...
BELL v. WOLFISH | FindLaw
Case opinion for US Supreme Court BELL v. WOLFISH. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.
Bell v. Wolfish | Oyez
Jan 16, 1979 ... Do certain conditions of confinement violate the individual liberty, due process, and privacy of pretrial detainees as protected by the First, Fourth ...
Bell v. Wolfish - Significance - Detainees, Court, Pretrial, and Mcc ...
The respondent, Louis Wolfish, a detainee in the City of New York Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC), on behalf of other detainees, demanded abrogation ...
Bell v. Wolfish Case Brief | 4 Law School
Summary of Bell v. Wolfish Citation: 441 U.S. 520 (1979) Relevant Facts: Wolfish and other defendants (Respondents here) brought this class action in federal ...
Impact of Bell v. Wolfish Upon Prisoner's Rights
Annotation: This analysis of the 1979 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Bell v. Wolfish and of subsequent Federal court decisions concludes that although the ...
Bell v. Wolfish :: 441 U.S. 520 (1979) :: Justia U.S. Supreme ...
Syllabus; Case U.S. Supreme Court Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520 (1979) Bell v. Wolfish. No. 77-1829. Argued January 16, 1979. Decided May 14, 1979
Bell v. Wolfish. Media. Oral Argument - January 16, 1979; Petitioner Bell . Respondent Wolfish . Location Metropolitan Correctional Center. Docket no. 77-1829 ...
Bell v. Wolfish - ACLU Pros & Cons - ProCon.org
Dec 28, 2009 ... I. ISSUES: A. Issues Discussed: Criminal Justice (Prison), Fifth and Fourth Amendment, First Amendment B. Legal Question Presented: